Bonjour,
Le morceau de code me genere un fichier Notes.bib incorrect.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\documentclass[10pt,american,aps,showpacs,showkeyword,showkey]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage{fourier}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin9]{inputenc}
\usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,tmargin=2cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2cm,rmargin=2cm}
\pagestyle{plain}
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{esint}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage[unicode=true,pdfusetitle,
bookmarks=true,bookmarksnumbered=false,bookmarksopen=false,
breaklinks=false,pdfborder={0 0 1},backref=false,colorlinks=false]
{hyperref}
\makeatletter
\usepackage{upgreek} % PB with Beamer
\usepackage{color,fancybox}
%\usepackage{breakurl}
\usepackage{appendix}
% Because revtex does not like \doublespace
\makeatletter
\gdef@ptsize{0}% 10pt documents
% or:
%\gdef@ptsize{1}% 11pt documents
%\gdef@ptsize{2}% 12pt documents
\let@currsize\normalsize
%\makeatother
\usepackage{setspace}
\doublespace
%\graphicspath{ {Pictures/} }
% Remove \usepackage{mathrsfs} to use these Declaration
\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathscr}{FMS}{futm}{m}{n}%
\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathcal}{OMS}{cmr}{m}{n}%
%\fancyput(1.in,-7in){\Huge\bfseries\rotatebox{45}{\textcolor{yellow}{Version 7 Accepted in JQSRT}}}
%\usepackage{draftwatermark}
%\SetWatermarkAngle{45.0}
%\SetWatermarkColor{yellow}
%%\SetWatermarkLightness{ 0.5 }
%%\SetWatermarkFontSize{ length }
%\SetWatermarkScale{0.35}
%\SetWatermarkText{Version 5}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\title{Dipole Saturated}
\author{Patrick Dupré}
\email{xyz@xyz.tld}
\selectlanguage{american}%
\begin{abstract}
Quantitative,
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
\section{Modeling\label{sec:Modelling}}
\subsection{Background\label{subsec:Background}}
\subsubsection{Linear absorption}
As
\paragraph{DC components\label{par:Linear_DC-components}\protect \
}
The spectral extension of $\bm{\alpha}{m{u}m_{l}}^{\left(mono_{0}\right)}\left(\omega\right)$
is strictly limited to $\omega=0$. Hence, the temporal response is
trivial: a strict stationary behavior which can be experimentally
obtained through a standard DC transimpedance photodetector. By inserting
the usual Faddeeva function (or plasma dispersion function) $w_{\mathit{erf}}$
(area {[}real part{]} normalized by the factor $\Delta_{D}\sqrt{\pi/\ln2}$\footnote{\label{fn:werf}$w_{\mathit{erf}}\left(z\right)=\frac{{\rm i}}{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{{\rm e}^{-t^{2}},{\rm d}t}{z-t}$,
with $\mathcal{I}m\left(z\right)>0$}), it becomes the dependence versus the source carrier frequency $\omega_{0}$
Hello\footnote{${\rm e}\int_{0}^{z},{\rm d}t$}
\newpage{}
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
\bibliography{defs,saturation-e,CH4-e,DFM-e,EIT_EIA-e,Hitran-e,NICE-OHMS-e,misc-e,line_shape-e,C2H2-e,Frequency_comb-e,cavity-e,CRDS-e,H2_isot-e,FM-e,metrology-e,Book-e}
\end{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Notes.bib correct:
@FOOTNOTE{Note1,key=“Note1”,note=“\label {fn:werf}$w_{\protect \mathit {erf}}\left (z\right )={\begingroup {\protect \rm i}\endgroup \over \pi }\intop \nolimits _{-\infty }^{\infty }{\begingroup {\protect \rm e}^{-t^{2}}\protect ,{\protect \rm d}t\endgroup \over z-t}$, with $\protect \mathcal {I}m\left (z\right )>0$”}
@FOOTNOTE{Note2,key=“Note2”,note=“${\protect \rm e}\intop \nolimits _{0}^{z}\protect ,{\protect \rm d}t$”}
Notes.bib incorrect:
@FOOTNOTE{Note1,key=“Note1”,note=“\label {fn:werf}$w_{\protect \mathit {erf}}\left (z\right )=\protect \frac {{\protect \rm i}}{\pi }\DOTSI \intop \ilimits@ _{-\infty }^{\infty }\protect \frac {{\protect \rm e}^{-t^{2}}\protect \tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}{\protect \rm d}t}{z-t}$, with $\protect \mathcal {I}m\left (z\right )>0$”}
@FOOTNOTE{Note2,key=“Note2”,note=“${\protect \rm e}\DOTSI \intop \ilimits@ _{0}^{z}\protect \tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}{\protect \rm d}t$”}
Pourquoi ?